Matthew Forster is not widely recognized as a traditional artist in the historical or classical sense, and as of my last update, there is limited information available to construct a detailed biography that fits the conventional profile of an artist. It's possible that Matthew Forster may be more contemporary or involved in fields indirectly related to traditional art forms, such as digital art, design, or perhaps another area of creative or professional endeavor outside of the recognized canon of visual arts.
Given the broad and ever-evolving landscape of art and creative professions, individuals with a background in newer media or interdisciplinary practices might not have extensive historical documentation or a traditional biography that outlines their contributions to art history. However, the mention of Matthew Forster suggests there might be emerging interest or a developing body of work worth noting in contemporary discussions or studies.
The contemporary era has seen a significant expansion in the definition of what constitutes art and who is considered an artist. Professionals working in digital media, performance art, conceptual art, and other avant-garde territories have increasingly been recognized for their contributions to the cultural and artistic dialogues of the 21st century. If Matthew Forster is indeed working in one of these fields or another innovative area, his work may represent the ongoing evolution of artistic practices and the broadening of the art historical narrative to include diverse and contemporary voices.
Without specific details on his contributions, exhibitions, or the mediums he may work within, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive biography. Nonetheless, the potential inclusion of Matthew Forster in discussions of contemporary art underscores the importance of continuing to explore and document the work of artists outside the conventional boundaries of the art historical canon.