Emil Kraus is not widely recognized in the mainstream art historical narrative, and as a result, specific details about his life, including his birth and death years, are not readily available in the standard references or databases. This lack of information suggests that he may have been a more obscure or lesser-known figure in the art world, or possibly his contributions were in a niche area that has not been extensively documented or studied in general art history. Without more specific details, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive biography or to accurately place him within a particular art movement or context. It is also possible that Emil Kraus was involved in a field related to, but not directly within, the traditional visual arts, which could further explain the scarcity of readily available information. In such cases, deeper, specialized research might be necessary to uncover more about his life and work. If Emil Kraus was indeed an artist, his obscurity might be attributable to a variety of factors, including the era he lived in, the geographical region of his activity, or perhaps the medium in which he worked. Art history is replete with examples of artists who were only recognized posthumously or whose contributions have been reassessed and appreciated in a new light due to changing tastes or academic interests. Without more concrete information, any discussion of Emil Kraus remains speculative, underscoring the vast and varied tapestry of art history that includes not only luminaries but also countless lesser-known individuals whose stories are yet to be fully told.